In basic appearance, they’re similar. Screen-optimized fonts look clunky on the printed page.Ĭompare the two fonts above. This comes at the cost of design details, which have been sanded off because they don’t reproduce well on screen. Many system fonts have been optimized for the screen, not print. As we shift into the age of high-resolution color screens, these fonts have a declining comparative advantage. Moreover, fonts like Georgia were optimized for the coarse monochrome screens of the 1990s. I won’t name names, but my least favorite rhymes with Barial. The Windows and Mac OS libraries have improved, but they’re still minefields of awful fonts. In printed documents, they present three problems. Certain projects demand system fonts, which are the fonts already installed on your computer. More about that in font recommendations.īut professional fonts aren’t always an option. They’re the quickest and easiest way to upgrade your typography. System fonts Avoid if you can, choose wisely if you can’tĪs professional writers, lawyers ought to rely on professional fonts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |